King v. State

Broyles, C. J.

1. None of the excerpts from the charge of the court complained of, when considered in connection with the charge as a whole, shows cause for a reversal of the judgment below.

2. Under the facts of the ease, the court did not err in denying the defendant's motion for a mistrial.

3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ.} concur. Indictment for larceny of horse; from Bibb superior court— Judge Mathews. July 17, 1919. John R. Cooper, W. 0. Cooper Jr., for plaintiff in error. John P. Ross, solicitor-general, contra.