1. The court did not err in admitting the testimony complained of in the 1st special ground of the motion for a new trial. Under the facts of the case it was legal and relevant.
2. The excerpt from the charge of the court, excepted to, is not erroneous for any reason assigned.
3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.