Harrison v. Pool

ON MOTION EOR REHEARING.

Luke, J.

The answer, construed as a whole and most strongly against the pleader, shows no plea of mitigation of damages, but on the contrary it is intended as a complete defense to the plaintiff’s suit. What is here said is not intended to deprive the defendant of the right to file a plea of mitigation of damages, if he so desires.

Rehearing denied.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J„ concur.