1. Neither of the excerpts from the charge of the court complained of, when considered in the light of the entire charge and • the facts of the case, contains material error.
2. The 4th and 5th special grounds of the motion for a new trial are merely amplification of the usual general grounds. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.