Bloodworth, J.
1. There is no merit in the ground of the motion for a new trial in which it was contended ¡that the defendant’s right of cross-examination was unduly restricted by the court.
2. The court did not err in charging the jury- on the law as to shooting at another.
3. The evidence authorized the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.