Bell v. State

Bloodworth, J.

The evidence for the State shows an unprovoked attack with a deadly weapon upon the person assaulted. Even under the statement of the defendant a verdict of guilty was demanded. There is nothing in any of the special grounds of the motion for new trial which would demand that a verdict so clearly correct should he set aside.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke J., concur. M. C. Edwards, for plaintiff in error. B. T. Castellow, solicitor-general, R. R. Arnold, contra.