1. Tlie evidence in this case amply supported the verdict of guilty, and there was no error in the admission of evidence.
2. The assignment of error upon the alleged improper argument of counsel for the State raises no question for the determination of this court, since no motion for a mistrial was made.
3. For no reason assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.