Jackson v. State

Bloodworth, J.

1. The alleged newly discovered evidence is cumulative and impeaching in its character, and is not such evidence as would probably produce a different result upon another trial of the case.

*631Decided April 13, 1921.

Indictment for possessing liquor; from Randolph superior court — Judge Worrill. November 29, 1920.

Charles W. Worrill, for plaintiff in error. B. T. Castellow, solicitor-general, B. B. Arnold, contra.

2. JSTo error of law was committed upon the trial; the evidence supports the verdict, and the motion for a new trial was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Mike, J., concur.