There is no merit in the errors assigned upon the several excerpts from the charge of the court. If the defendant wished more particular instructions, timely request should have been made. The evidence authorized the conviction, and it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Harris & Harris, for plaintiff in error. E. S. Taylor, solicitor-general, J. F. Kelly, contra.