Odom v. State

Bloodwobth, J.

No error of law is complained of. The evidence is contradictory; the jury, the final arbiters on all questions of fact, believed the witnesses for the State, as they had a right to do, and returned a verdict of guilty, and this court cannot overturn such a verdict when approved by the judge who presided at the trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.