The evidence was not sufficient to authorize the defendant’s conviction, and the court therefore erred in overruling the general grounds of the motion for a new trial. It is unnecessary to consider the special grounds of the motion.
Judgment reversed.
Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Thomas & Walker, Benton Odom, for plaintiff in error,cited: 16 Ga. App. 216; 22 Ga. App. 274; 26 Ga. App. 421; Id. 426 (3).
James R. Thomas, solicitor, W. B. Gills, contra.