While the preponderance of the evidence was in the defendant’s favor, it cannot be held that his conviction was unauthorized by any evidence; and, the finding of the jury having been approved by *285the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere with it.
Decided May 16, 1923. T. P. Stephens, for plaintiff in error. William Brunson, solicitor, contra. ■Judgment affirmed.
Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.