Gafford v. State

Broyles, C. J.

1. In the light of all the facts of the case, none of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial (many'of which are too incomplete and defective to be considered) requires a reversal of the judgment below.

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworlh, JJ., coneur.