The conviction of the accused was amply authorized by the evidence, and for no reason pointed out in the record did the court err in overruling his motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, 0. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.The conviction of the accused was amply authorized by the evidence, and for no reason pointed out in the record did the court err in overruling his motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, 0. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.