Thomas v. State

Bboyles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only. The verdict was authorized by the evidence; and, the *770finding of tlie jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Decided May 11, 1927. W. B. Cook, Franklin & Langdale, for plaintiff in error. R. G. Dickerson, solicitor-general, contra.

Judgment affirmed. Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.