There being no evidence that the “home brew” found in the defendant’s place of business was an intoxicating beverage, his *257conviction of possessing intoxicating liquors was unauthorized, and the refusal to grant him a new trial was error.
Decided June 12, 1928. Rehearing denied July 10, 1928. M. B. Eubcmlcs, for plaintiff in error.Judgment reversed.
Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.