The motion for a new trial contained only the usual gen- ■ eral grounds; the evidence authorized the verdict, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.The motion for a new trial contained only the usual gen- ■ eral grounds; the evidence authorized the verdict, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.