I think the testimony of the possession of liquor on other occasions tended to prove that the defendant knowingly had the intoxicating liquor in his possession, and that it was therefore competent. See concurring opinion in Phillips v. State, 51 Ga. App. 675 (181 S. E. 233, 234). I also think the evidence admissible for the reason given in Judge Guerry’s special concurrence infra. I concur in the judgment of affirmance.