Curtis Leon Taylor, Sr. v. L.C. Chastain, Officer, P. Knight, Larry Huffman, Regional Administrator, Teresa Stewart, Adjustment Committee Chairperson, Barry Beard, Adjustment Committee Member, S.R. Morris, A.W. Wollfrey, Assistant Warden, John B. Taylor, Warden, M.U. Jones, William P. Rogers, R.L. Howdyshell, Officer, D.S. Massie, J.D. Wilson, Adjustment Committee Member, Edward C. Morris, Edward W. Murray, Fred Settle, C.D. Larsen, Susan Bratton, L.B. Cei, B. Nibson, Commonwealth of Virginia, John Does, Named and Unnamed

935 F.2d 1287
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Curtis Leon TAYLOR, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
L.C. CHASTAIN, Officer, P. Knight, Larry Huffman, Regional
Administrator, Teresa Stewart, Adjustment Committee
Chairperson, Barry Beard, Adjustment Committee Member, S.R.
Morris, A.W. Wollfrey, Assistant Warden, John B. Taylor,
Warden, M.U. Jones, William P. Rogers, R.L. Howdyshell,
Officer, D.S. Massie, J.D. Wilson, Adjustment Committee
Member, Edward C. Morris, Edward W. Murray, Fred Settle,
C.D. Larsen, Susan Bratton, L.B. Cei, B. Nibson,
Commonwealth of Virginia, John Does, named and unnamed,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-7080.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 3, 1991.
Decided June 19, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (CA-90-740-R)

Curtis Leon Taylor, Sr., appellant pro se.

Gayl Branum Carr, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Curtis Leon Taylor, Sr. appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Taylor v. Chastain, CA-90-740-R (W.D.Va. Apr. 15, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED