The sole enumeration of error in this appeal from appellants’ convictions of armed robbery is on the general *663grounds. Since the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, would have authorized a jury to find appellants guilty of armed robbery beyond a reasonable doubt, the judgment is affirmed under Rule 36 of the rules of this court (Code Ann. § 24-3636).
Submitted November 5, 1979 — Decided December 3, 1979. J. Douglas Willix, for appellants. Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Joseph J. Drolet, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.Judgment affirmed.
Deen, C. J., and Carley, J., concur.