The defendant appeals his conviction for rape and aggravated assault. Held:
1. The evidence was sufficient, when viewed in a light favorable to the verdict, to convince a rational trier of fact as to the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
2. The trial court did not err in overruling the defendant’s motion in limine which sought to exclude testimony of a photographic identification.
Judgment affirmed.
McMurray, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.