United States v. Kim

Case: 20-20611 Document: 00516163130 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 11, 2022 No. 20-20611 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Kenenty Kim, Defendant—Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:19-CR-783-1 Before Davis, Jones, and Elrod, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Kenenty Kim has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Kim has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently * Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 20-20611 Document: 00516163130 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/11/2022 No. 20-20611 developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Kim’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Kim’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Kim’s motion for the appointment of new counsel is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998). 2