Schwartz v. William K.

Court: New York Court of Appeals
Date filed: 1886-12-07
Citations: 1 Silv. Ct. App. 237, 4 N.Y. St. Rep. 288
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Lead Opinion
Per Curiam.

Under the provisions of the Revised Statutes (3 R. S., [7th ed.] 2238, §§ 20, 21), the assignment of September 28, 1885, was void for the reason that it contained preferences. The assignment of October 1, 1885, was therefore valid. Upon this ground the order of the general term should be affirmed.

All concur.