Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in restoring the juvenile delinquency proceeding and in declining to dismiss the underlying petition pursuant to the previously-ordered adjournment in contemplation of dismissal (see Family Ct Act § 353.1). After a proper inquiry (see Matter of Edwin L., 88 NY2d 593, 602-603 [1996]), the Family Court determined that the appellant violated the conditions stated in that prior adjournment in contemplation of dismissal by, among other things, failing to attend school on a regular basis (see Matter of Jamel A., 19 AD3d 689 [2005]; Matter of Nikita P., 3 AD3d 499, 501 [2004]). Adams, J.P., Ritter, Mastro and Skelos, JJ., concur.