Aaron Holsey v. William Donald Schaefer, Governor, Individually and as Governor of the State of Maryland Bishop L. Robinson, Individually and as the Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services Paul Davis, Individually and as Chairperson of the Maryland Parole Commission Donald Atkinson, Individually and as Director of the Department of Parole and Probation

Related Cases

948 F.2d 1281

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Aaron HOLSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William Donald SCHAEFER, Governor, Individually and as
Governor of the State of Maryland; Bishop L. Robinson,
Individually and as the Secretary of Public Safety and
Correctional Services; Paul Davis, Individually and as
Chairperson of the Maryland Parole Commission; Donald
Atkinson, Individually and as Director of the Department of
Parole and Probation, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-7217.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 28, 1991.
Decided Nov. 15, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge. (CA-89-2280-K)

Aaron Holsey, appellant pro se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Timothy James Paulus, Assistant Attorney General, George Albert Eichhorn, III, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, SPROUSE, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Aaron Holsey appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Holsey v. Schaefer, No. CA-89-2280-K (D.Md. July 19, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.