Order, entered on February 4, 1960, denying defendant’s motion pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the third, fourth, fifth and *450sixth causes of action of the second amended complaint on the ground of insufficiency, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally and Stevens, JJ.