In related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6 to modify a prior or
Ordered that the appeal from the decision dated May 4, 2006 is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from a decision (see Family Ct Act § 1112 [a]; Schiechi v J.A. Green Constr. Corp., 100 AD2d 509 [1984]); and it is further,
Ordered that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
There is a sound and substantial basis in the record to support the Family Court’s determination that there was a sufficient change in circumstances since the parties entered into an agreement concerning custody on December 11, 2003 and that a transfer of sole legal and physical custody of the child to the mother would be in the child’s best interests (see Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 171 [1982]; Friederwitzer v Friederwitzer, 55 NY2d 89, 94 [1982]; Matter of Sharma v Sharma, 35 AD3d 746 [2006]; Pambianchi v Goldberg, 35 AD3d 688 [2006]; cf. Matter of Greene v Gordon, 7 AD3d 528 [2004]; Matter of Fallon v Fallon, 4 AD3d 426 [2004]). Accordingly, the Family Court properly modified the agreement and order by awarding the mother sole custody of the child (see Matter of Sharma v Sharma, supra).
The father’s remaining contentions are without merit. Spolzino, J.E, Goldstein, Fisher and McCarthy, JJ., concur.