Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for the entry of a judgment declaring that the defendants are not obligated to maintain, repair, and/or replace the subject catch basins.
The defendants established their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by demonstrating that they bore no responsibility to maintain, repair, and/or replace the plaintiffs drainage system along Route US-1 pursuant to Highway Law § 46 (see Mason v State of New York, 180 AD2d 63, 66 [1992]; Washington County Sewer Dist. No. 2 v White, 177 AD2d 204, 206 [1992]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]).
Since this is, in part, a declaratory judgment action, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for the entry of a judgment declaring that the defendants are not obligated to maintain, repair, and/or replace the subject catch basins (see Lanza v Wagner, 11 NY2d 317, 334 [1962], appeal dismissed 371 US 74 [1962], cert denied, 371 US 901 [1962]). Fisher, J.E, Santucci, Balkin and Belen, JJ., concur.