Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mangano, Jr, J.), rendered April 25, 2006, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]; People v Wilson, 50 AD3d 711 [2008]; People v Leon, 19 AD3d 509, 510 [2005], affd 7 NY3d 109 [2006]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish that the defendant possessed a loaded and operable weapon with the requisite intent to use it unlawfully against another (see People v Pons, 68 NY2d 264, 267-268 [1986]; People v Wilson, 50 AD3d 711 [2008]; People v Leon, 19 AD3d 509, 510 [2005], affd 7 NY3d 109 [2006]; People v Smith, 16 AD3d 602 [2005]). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power (see CPL 470.15 [5]), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).