Order, entered June 24, 1968, granting a temporary stay of arbitration to MVAIC, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and disbursements, and MVAIC’s motion for a permanent stay granted, without costs. The infant claimant was allegedly injured on May 22, 1966, when an automobile in which he was riding and which was being driven by Stern, collided with an automobile driven by Indelieato. The claimants (the infant and his mother) have alleged that they were “insured” persons under the uninsured indemnification indorsement in a policy of insurance issued to the mother on an automobile owned by her. Since the policy referred to was issued subsequent to July 1, 1965, claimants’ relief as “ insured ” persons is against the insurer under said policy and not against MVAIC. (Insurance Law, § 167, subd. 2-a; § 605, subd. [a]; Allstate Ins. Co. v. MVAIC, 30 A D 2d 803.) Furthermore, it appears that an arbitration proceeding was instituted by the claimants as “insured” persons under a liability policy covering the Stem vehicle. Finally, *794the claimants’ alleged status as “qualified persons” is questionable (see Matter of Knickerbocker Ins. Co. [Farson], 22 N Y 2d 554, 559; Allstate Ins. Co. v. MVAIC, supra), and, in any event, they d,o not have an arbitrable claim .against MYAIC. Concur—Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, Markewieh, Rabin and Maeken, JJ.
In re the Arbitration between Gordon & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
Related Cases
- In re the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation & Levy
- In re the Arbitration between Ross & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
- In re the Arbitration between Maffetone & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
- In re the Arbitration between Richard & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
- In re the Arbitration between McGorman & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.