United States v. Alaniz

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 18, 2008 No. 07-10735 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. ROBERTO ALANIZ Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 7:06-CR-21-ALL Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Roberto Alaniz appeals the 33-month sentence he received following his guilty-plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). He argues that the sentence imposed is unreasonable. Specifically, Alaniz contends that the district court failed to give adequate consideration to mitigating factors, failed to articulate adequate reasons under * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 07-10735 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) for the sentence imposed, and treated the guidelines as mandatory. Because the sentence Alaniz received fell within the correctly calculated guidelines range, it is presumptively reasonable. United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir. 2006). The district court’s proper consideration of the § 3553(a) factors is inferred. See United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 519 (5th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 828 (2005). Alaniz has not overcome the presumption of correctness attached to his sentence. The district court’s judgment is affirmed. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance or, alternatively, for an extension of time to file an appellate brief is denied. AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED. 2