In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by the First Department in 1990, was suspended by this Court’s order dated October 25, 2007 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 44 AD3d 1246 [2007]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that she has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and she is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Cardona, EJ., Mercure, Peters, Spain and Rose, JJ., concur. *1363Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.