In an action, inter alia, for reformation, based on mistake, of plaintiff’s choice of a retirement plan, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 23, 1976, which denied its motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The trial court properly denied the motion for summary judgment. The record presents disputed factual issues which cannot be resolved on the papers submitted on this motion, and which require a trial for their determination. Cohalan, Acting P. J, Hawkins, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ, concur.
Weinberg v. New York City Employees' Retirement System
Related Cases
- Weinberg v. New York City Employees' Retirement System
- Matter of Benjamin v. New York City Employees Retirement Sys.
- Matter of Heidelmark v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys.
- Matter of Ly v. New York City Employees Retirement Sys.
- Matter of Harris v. New York State & Local Retirement Sys.