The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations, including its
Page 610
evaluation of alleged inconsistencies in testimony. Concur— Mazzarellí, J.E, Friedman, Catterson, Renwick and Richter, JJ.