Hoffliss Water Corp. v. Arne

Related Cases

Artesian Water Company, in No. 87-3622 v. The Government of New Castle County, Defendant/third-Party v. Landfill, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Material Transit, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Edgar Thomas Harvey, Edgar Thomas Harvey, Jr., W. Lawrence Knotts, Henry A. Twardus, William Q. Saienni, Elme D. Saienni, Salvatore J. Saienni, Dominic Cantera, Marian Cantera, Delaware Sand and Gravel Company, a Delaware Corporation, Anita Dell Aversano, Individually and as of the Estate of Joseph Dell Aversano, Vincent Dell Aversano, Marcella Dell Aversano, Stauffer Chemical Co., a Delaware Corporation, Haveg Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Champlain Cable Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Angelo Terranova, Stanley J. Twardus & Sons, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Sca Services, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Third-Party Artesian Water Company v. The Government of New Castle County, Defendant/third-Party v. Landfill, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Material Transit, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Edgar Thomas Harvey, Edgar Thomas Harvey, Jr., W. Lawrence Knotts, Henry A. Twardus, William Q. Saienni, Elme D. Saienni, Salvator J. Saienni, Dominic Cantera, Marian Cantera, Delaware Sand and Gravel Company, a Delaware Corporation, Anita Dell Aversano, Individually and as of the Estate of Joseph Dell Aversano, Vincent Dell Aversano, Marcella Dell Aversano, Stauffer Chemical Co., a Delaware Corporation, Haveg Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Champlain Cable Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Angelo Terranova, Stanley J. Twardus & Sons, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Sca Services, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Third-Party Appeal of New Castle County
In Re Artesian Water Company
1fallani v. American Water Corp
Bonarrigo Enterprises, Inc. v. Highridge Water Authority
Staatsburg Water Co. v. Staatsburg Fire District

—• In two actions for permanent injunctions to enjoin defendants from using wells located on their premises for domestic water service, plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Delaney, J.), dated May 5, 1981, which granted defendants’ cross motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaints in both actions and denied plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction, (2) an order of the same court, dated July 13, 1981, which, upon reargument, granted defendants Brandes an award of $3,000 counsel fees, and (3) a judgment of the same court entered thereon on July 27, 1981. Appeals from orders dated May 5, 1981 and July 13, 1981 dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). Judgment entered July *99027,1981, modified, on the law, by deleting therefrom the provision granting an application for counsel fees, and substituting therefor a provision denying said application, and order dated July 13,1981 is vacated. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. It was an abuse of discretion for Special Term to have awarded counsel fees under the guise of an additional allowance pursuant to CPLR 8303 (subd [a], par 2)(see Tucker v Toia, 64 AD2d 826). We find plaintiff’s other contentions to be without merit. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Mangano and Brown, JJ., concur.