United States v. Ismael Mendoza-Loya

967 F.2d 594

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ismael MENDOZA-LOYA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-10480.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 8, 1992.*
Decided June 10, 1992.

Before ALARCON, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM**

2

We affirm the judgment of the district court, for the reasons given in the district judge's order.

3

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3