Winston Lloyd, and William N. Hobbins David Kinder v. Thomas R. Corcoran, Warden Elmanus Herndon, Acting Commissioner, in His Individual and Official Capacity Bishop L. Robinson, Secretary, Department of Public Safety, in His Individual and Official Capacity William Donald Schaefer, Governor, State of Maryland, in His Individual and Official Capacity

968 F.2d 1211

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Winston LLOYD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
William N. HOBBINS; David Kinder, Plaintiffs,
v.
Thomas R. CORCORAN, Warden; Elmanus Herndon, Acting
Commissioner, In his individual and official capacity;
Bishop L. Robinson, Secretary, Department of Public Safety,
In his individual and official capacity; William Donald
Schaefer, Governor, State of Maryland, In his individual and
official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-6608.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 12, 1991
Decided: July 8, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-90-2118-B)

Winston Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Timothy James Paulus, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Winston Lloyd appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Lloyd v. Corcoran, No. CA-90-2118-B (D. Md. May 7, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We note that even if Lloyd's claims for injunctive relief could be characterized as capable of repetition yet evading review, thereby avoiding a finding of mootness, they fail on the merits