969 F.2d 1041
Cellular America Tal
v.
Contel Cellular, Inc.
NO. 92-7068
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
May 11, 1992
1
Appeal From: N.D.N.Y.
2
AFFIRMED.
Cellular America Tal v. Contel Cellular, Inc
Related Cases
- Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., United States Cellular Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, American Cellular Network Corp., Doing Business as Comsat Cellular Communications, Inc. And Ellis Thompson Corp., Intervenors
- Cellnet Communication, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, McCaw Cellular Communications, Inc., Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association, Amarillo Celltelco, Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc., North American Telecommunications Association, Intervenors. National Cellular Resellers Association v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, Bellsouth Corporation, Nynex Mobile Communications Company, McCaw Cellular Communications, Inc., Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association, Amarillo Celltelco, Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc., North American Telecommunications Association, Intervenors
- Maxcell Telecom Plus, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, Yankee Celltell Co., Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., Bellsouth Mobility Inc., Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, Nynex Mobile Communications Co., Radiofone, Inc., Centel Corporation, MCI Cellular Telephone Company, New Vector Communications, Inc., Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc., Baldwin Telecom, Inc., Contel Cellular Inc., Intervenors. Northwestern Indiana Telephone Company, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, Yankee Celltell Co., Bellsouth Mobility Inc., Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, Nynex Mobile Communications Co., Radiofone, Inc., Centel Corporation, MCI Cellular Telephone Company, Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc., Continental Telecom, Inc., Baldwin Telecom, Inc., Intervenors. Maxcell Telecom Plus, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, St. Louis Cellular System, Inc., New Orleans Cgsa, Inc., Centel Corporation, Yankee Celltell, Co., Newvector Communications, Inc., Continental Telecom, Inc., Intervenors. La Star Cellular Telephone Company v. Federal Communications Commission, New Orleans Cgsa, Inc., Contel Cellular, Inc., Intervenors. Northwestern Indiana Telephone Company, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, New Orleans Cgsa, Inc., Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc., Contel Cellular Inc., Intervenors. Harry J. Pappas D/B/A California Portaphone v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, Nynex Mobile Communications Co., Bellsouth Mobility Inc., MCI Cellular Telephone Company, Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc., Continental Telecom, Inc., Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., Intervenors
- Celcom Communications Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Cellular Telephone Company (Ctc
- Goodwin (Barclay R., Jr.), Cellular Logic, Inc., Cell Cal-Ii, Cellucall, Inc., Gbbv Investment Co., Laurmann (Giselle v. , Morelli (Robert), Neoteric Communications Group, Ramcell, Inc. R.H. Associates, Tricel Group, U.S. Cellular, Inc., Port Services Co., Capper (Emmett M.), Jordan (Robert Bruce), Russell (Owen C.), B & L Cellular, Suggs (Gordon), U.S. Cellular v. Celutel, Inc., Scarpa (Frank S.), McCaw Cellular Communications, Inc., Vanguard Cellullar Serv