We have withheld decision in this matter on two previous occasions because of an inadequate record which prevented our review of the correctness of County Court’s Sandoval ruling (106 AD2d 680; 102 AD2d 924). We have now received a transcript which reveals County Court’s reasoning for its Sandoval ruling. We have examined defendant’s other arguments and find that none warrant reversal.
Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Weiss, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.