Defendant also argues that the pretrial identification should not have been admitted at trial because it was the product of an arrest unsupported by probable cause. There is no merit to this claim. The police, responding to a call of a burglary in progress, confirmed their information upon arrival at the scene. They observed the defendant, who matched the earlier description of one of the suspects, jump up and run. Thus, the officer clearly had reasonable cause to believe that the defendant committed a crime (see, CPL 140.10 [1] [b]; People v Valo, 92 AD2d 1004, 1005; People v Rivera, 67 AD2d 867).
Defendant’s claim that the verdict of guilty of burglary in the third degree was repugnant to the verdict of not guilty of grand larceny in the third degree and petit larceny was not preserved for review (see, People v Satloff, 56 NY2d 745, 746; People v McDavis, 97 AD2d 302, 305) and is without merit in any event. The crimes have different elements (cf. People v Tucker, 55 NY2d 1, 6, rearg denied 55 NY2d 1039). Conviction for burglary only requires proof of larcenous intent not proof of actual commission of a larceny (see, People v Barnes, 50 NY2d 375, 379; People v Dodson, 96 AD2d 1116, 1117; see also, People v Clark, 70 AD2d 683). On this record we conclude that the verdict was amply supported by the evidence. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Celli, J. — burglary, third degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Schnepp, JJ.