The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]), and we do not find that term to be excessive. We have no authority to revisit defendant’s prison sentence on this appeal (see id. at 635). Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Acosta and Román, JJ.
People v. Randolph
Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date filed: 2012-12-13
Citations: 101 A.D.3d 482, 954 N.Y.2d 868
Copy CitationsLead Opinion