Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1984 and maintains an office for the practice of law in Massachusetts.
By order dated February 21, 2013, the Board of Bar Overseers of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court publicly reprimanded respondent for improperly managing his attorney trust account.
As a result of the discipline imposed in Massachusetts, petitioner moves for an order imposing discipline pursuant to this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 806.19). Respondent has filed a reply affidavit that we conclude does not establish any of the available defenses to the imposition of discipline (see 22 NYCRR 806.19 [d]), and we therefore grant petitioner’s motion.
Having considered all of the circumstances presented, including due consideration of respondent’s misconduct and the discipline imposed in Massachusetts, we conclude that respondent should be censured in this state (see e.g. Matter of Weissman, 32 AD3d 1150 [2006]).
Peters, EJ., Rose, Spain and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that petitioner’s motion is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is hereby censured.