It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [4]). Contrary to the contention of defendant, County Court properly refused to suppress his written and oral statements to the police. The record establishes that defendant’s statements were voluntarily made; there is no indication in the record of the suppression hearing that he “ ‘was intoxicated to the degree of mania, or of being unable to understand the meaning of his statements’ ” (People v Schompert, 19 NY2d 300, 305 [1967], cert denied 389 US 874 [1967]; see People v Peterkin, 89 AD3d 1455, 1455 [2011], lv denied 18 NY3d 885 [2012]; People v Prober, 298 AD2d 966, 967 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 538 [2002]). Present — Centra, J.P, Peradotto, Garni and Lindley, JJ.