[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-14443 March 26, 2008
Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN
CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 03-00221-CR-WS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARIA A. DE LOS ANGELES GARCIA-FLORES, a.k.a.
Maria Garcia,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
_________________________
(March 26, 2008)
BeforeTJOFLAT, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Gregory Hughes, appointed counsel for Maria De Los Angeles
Garcia-Flores, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief
prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d
493 (1967).
Previously, in United States v. Maria De Los Angeles Garcia-Flores,
no. 04-15327, we affirmed Garcia-Flores’s convictions for: (1) conspiracy to
possess with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846,
841(b)(1)(A); (2) possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of
21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1),(b)(1)(A); and (3) failure to appear in court, in
violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3146(a). Although we affirmed the sentence for
Garcia-Flores’s failure to appear, we vacated her drug trafficking sentences and
remanded for resentencing in accordance with United States v. Booker, 543 U.S.
220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). The district court resentenced
Garcia-Flores to 188 months imprisonment on both counts, set to run concurrently,
followed by 5 years supervised release, and she now appeals the reimposed
sentences.
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Garcia-Flores’s aggregate sentence is
AFFIRMED.
2