995 F.2d 305
301 U.S.App.D.C. 405
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
UNITED STATES of America
v.
David R. FREEMAN, a/k/a David Ray Freeman, Appellant.
No. 92-3083.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
May 20, 1993.
Rehearing Denied July 27, 1993.
Before: WALD, RUTH B. GINSBURG and SILBERMAN, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 14(c). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that appellant's conviction be affirmed. The challenged statements in the prosecutor's closing argument, which questioned the credibility of both appellant and a witness, did not constitute misconduct. See United States v. North, 910 F.2d 843, 895 (D.C.Cir.1990), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 2235 (1991).
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 15.