UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7309
CHRISTOPHER BERNARD JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SC DEPT OF CORRECTIONS; JON OZMINT; SC DEPT PROBATION PAROLE
AND PARDON SERVICES; SAMUEL GLOVER; GREENVILLE TECHNICAL
COLLEGE, et al.; TIM RILEY, Warden, Tyger River Correctional
Institution; ROBERT HAL MAUNEY, Warden, Northside and
Livesay Correctional Institution; PEGGY ROGERS, Lieutenant
at Tyger River; ROGER RABB, Casemanager at Tyger River;
KAREN FOWLER, Caseworker at Tyger River; B. LEWIS,
Caseworker at Tyger River; BILLY HYATT; MARY H. MCCABE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior
District Judge. (3:07-cv-01876-PMD)
Submitted: March 10, 2010 Decided: March 25, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Bernard Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Todd Darwin,
HOLCOMBE, BOMAR, GUNN & BRADFORD, PA, Spartanburg, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Bernard Jones seeks to appeal the district
court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge and dismissing Jones’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice
of appeal was not timely filed.
Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of
the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal,
Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends
the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the
appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period
is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of
Corr., 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v.
Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)).
The district court’s order was entered on the docket
on April 2, 2009. The notice of appeal was filed on June 1,
2009. Because Jones failed to file a timely notice of appeal or
to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period within
the time periods specified in Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6), * we
dismiss the appeal. We deny Jones’ motion for appointment of
*
Although Jones stated in his notice of appeal that he did
not receive notice of the entry of the district court’s final
order until May 14, 2009, his notice of appeal falls outside of
the seven-day requirement in Rule 4(a)(6)(B) and therefore a
reopening of the appeal period is not permitted.
3
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
4