Merial Ltd. v. Cipla Ltd.

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit MERIAL LIMITED AND MERIAL SAS, Plaintiffs-Appellees, ' AND BASF AGRO B.V., Plaintiff, V. CIPLA LIMITED, _ Defendant-Appellant, AND V`ELCERA, INC. AND FIDOPHARM, INC., Defendo:n,ts-Appellants, AND ARCHIPELAGO SUPPLIERS, ARROWTARGET ENTERPRISES LTD., GENERIC PETMEDS, INHOUSE DRUGSTORE, LISA PERKO, PETCARE PHARMACY, AND PETMEDS R US, Defendants. 2011-1471, -1472 Appeals from the United States District C0urt for the Middle Dist1'ict of Ge0rgia in case 110. 07-CV-0125, Judge C1ay D. Land. BASF AGRO V. CIPLA LIMlTED 2 ON MOTION Bef0re LOURIE, C.ircuit Judge. 0 R D E R The appellants move to take judicial notice of two documents from reexamination proceeding and portions of a third document from that proceeding Merial Limited and Merial SAS (Merial) oppose. - The appellants assert that the documents are "rele- vant to issues of claim construction and infringement." Merial argues that the appellants did not make claim construction arguments below and that the appellants successfully opposed introduction of one of the documents in the district court ~ Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THATZ The motion is denied. FoR THE CoURT SEP 0 1 2011 /s/ J an Horbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk cc: Nagendra Setty, Esq. Jonathan G. Graves, Esq. Gregory A. Castanias, Esq. FlLED 88 s.s.coum cs Aa=PEALs ron ms sansom macon SEP 01 2011 .1AN HDRBALY CLEH(