| Matter of Curry-Malcolm v New York State Teachers' Retirement Sys. |
| 2022 NY Slip Op 00760 |
| Decided on February 4, 2022 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on February 4, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
44 CA 21-00402
v
NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, RESPONDENT, HONEOYE FALLS-LIMA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, RUSH-HENRIETTA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ROCHESTER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, ASSOCIATION OF SUPERVISORS AND ADMINISTRATORS OF ROCHESTER, AND BROWN HUTCHINSON LLP, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)
BERNICE CURRY-MALCOLM, PETITIONER-APPELLANT PRO SE.
LETITIA JAMES, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (DUSTIN J. BROCKNER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM.
FERRARA, FIORENZA PC, EAST SYRACUSE (MILES G. LAWLOR OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS HONEOYE FALLS-LIMA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT AND
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order and judgment) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Gail Donofrio, J.), entered August 4, 2020 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment, among other things, granted the pre-answer motions to dismiss the petition brought by respondents Honeoye Falls-Lima Central School District, Rush-Henrietta Central School District, Rochester City School District, Association of Supervisors and Administrators of Rochester, and Brown Hutchinson LLP.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.
Entered: February 4, 2022
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court