FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 3 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-30262
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:09-cr-05868-RBL
v.
MEMORANDUM *
IVAN RODRIGUEZ-MENDOZA,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Washington
Ronald B. Leighton, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 27, 2011 **
Before: HAWKINS, SILVERMAN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Ivan Rodriguez-Mendoza appeals from his jury conviction and
77-month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
§ 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm, but remand to
correct the judgment.
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Rodriguez-Mendoza contends that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right
to effective assistance of counsel when his trial attorney failed to: (1) object to his
appearance at trial in “jail clothing;” (2) give an opening statement; or (3) present
any witnesses. We decline to review these claims on direct appeal as the record is
insufficiently developed and the legal representation was not so inadequate that it
obviously denied Rodriguez-Mendoza his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. See
United States v. Benford, 574 F.3d 1228, 1231 (9th Cir. 2009).
In accordance with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062
(9th Cir. 2000), we remand the case to the district court with instructions that it
delete from the judgment the clerical error resulting in the incorrect reference to
8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). See United States v. Herrera-Blanco, 232 F.3d 715, 719
(9th Cir. 2000) (remanding sua sponte to delete the reference to § 1326(b)).
AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct the judgment.
2 10-30262