The executors appeal from the decision of the transfer tax appraiser, by which a trust fund created by the *60will of John Davol for the benefit of his daughter, the decedent in this case, has been taxed, upon a finding that the same passes to the decedent’s children by means of an appointment contained in her will.
By the father’s will the fund, left in trust to the daughter for life, was at her death to go to such persons as she might lawfully appoint to receive it. But the will further provided as follows:
“ If such daughter shall fail to lawfully exercise said power of disposition by her will, or if for any cause a reversion should occur as to the same or any part thereof, they (the trustees) shall pay the same to the lawful issue of such daughter, in the same manner as if such daughter had died intestate owning the same.”
Under the mother’s will there is an appointment by .means of > which, if it were allowed to determine the disposition of the fund, the children of the testatrix would receive the same under an absolute legal title.
It thus results that in any event the trust fund reaches the same hands. The question is whether the taxable transfer was effected by the father’s will, without the intervention of the appointment.
Under the father’s will the children of the testatrix were given a vested remainder. Real Property Law, §§ 30, 31. Their estate, though subject to defeasance by the mother’s appointment, was neither divested nor confirmed by the nomination in the mother’s will of the same persons to receive the same estate. The appointment did nothing. It changed nothing. It left the fund subject only to the operation of the earlier will. Matter of Lansing, 182 N. Y. 238.
The interest of these children is not taxable in this proceeding and the ruling of the transfer tax appraiser, so far as it bears upon the question herein considered, is reversed, but in other respects the report is confirmed.
Decreed accordingly.